Enroll Course: https://www.coursera.org/learn/science-forensique-tribunal
Forensic science has always been a captivating subject, especially with its portrayal in popular media. However, the reality of forensic evidence is often more complex than what is depicted on screen. The Coursera course ‘La science forensique au tribunal: témoin digne de foi?’ offers an insightful exploration into the critical thinking required when evaluating forensic science in legal contexts.
### Course Overview
This course, offered by the University of Lausanne, aims to foster critical reflection on forensic science, also known as technical and scientific police or criminalistics. It addresses the common misconception that forensic evidence is infallible and provides 100% factual results. Through a structured syllabus, the course delves into various aspects of forensic evidence and its implications in court.
### Syllabus Breakdown
– **Week 1: What Makes a Good Expert Report?**
The course begins by establishing the context and introducing the instructors. It emphasizes the importance of well-structured forensic reports and introduces the ENFSI guidelines for evaluative reporting. This week sets the foundation for understanding how reliable evidence should be presented in court.
– **Week 2: The Source is Not the Activity!**
This week challenges the notion that forensic evidence alone can solve a case. Through case studies involving DNA evidence, it highlights the importance of understanding how evidence relates to the activities surrounding a crime.
– **Week 3: DNA is Not the Ultimate Weapon**
Focusing on international cases, this week discusses the complexities of interpreting DNA evidence, especially in low quantities. It stresses the need for rigorous control procedures to avoid contamination and misinterpretation.
– **Week 4: Accusing with Statistics or Accusing Them?**
Here, the course examines how forensic technicians communicate the value of their findings, using famous cases to illustrate the misuse of statistics in court. It also addresses logical fallacies that can arise in forensic arguments.
– **Week 5: The Wonderful World of Certainty**
The final week explores the implications of expert identification in cases involving ear prints and fingerprints. It emphasizes that identification decisions should rest with the court, not solely with forensic experts, and discusses the potential for erroneous identifications.
### Conclusion
Overall, ‘La science forensique au tribunal: témoin digne de foi?’ is an enlightening course that encourages participants to critically assess the role of forensic science in the judicial system. It is highly recommended for anyone interested in criminal justice, forensic science, or legal studies. The course not only provides valuable knowledge but also equips learners with the critical thinking skills necessary to navigate the complexities of forensic evidence in court.
### Recommendation
If you’re intrigued by the intersection of science and law, this course is a must-take. It will enhance your understanding of forensic science and its application in real-world legal scenarios, making you a more informed consumer of forensic evidence in any context.
Enroll today and embark on a journey to uncover the truths behind forensic science in the courtroom!
Enroll Course: https://www.coursera.org/learn/science-forensique-tribunal